Colorado Security Officer Jurisprudence Practice Exam 2026 - Free Security Officer Jurisprudence Practice Questions and Study Guide

The "Duty to Intervene" refers specifically to the obligation of security officers, and indeed law enforcement personnel, to take action when they observe another officer engaging in excessive force or any inappropriate behavior that violates established protocols or ethical standards. This principle is rooted in the understanding that all officers are accountable not only for their own conduct but also for ensuring that their colleagues adhere to the law and ethical guidelines.

In situations where one officer uses excessive force, the training emphasizes that it is not only permissible but expected for another officer to step in and prevent harm. This duty is crucial for maintaining public trust in security and law enforcement agencies, ensuring that excessive use of force is addressed rather than tolerated. Additionally, it establishes a culture of accountability among officers, where wrongdoing is confronted rather than ignored.

This responsibility is distinct from protecting one's own safety, reporting misconduct to superiors, or informing law enforcement about incidents. While those are important roles, the essence of the "Duty to Intervene" specifically mandates direct action in the face of visible misconduct, reinforcing the proactive stance required of officers in safeguarding both community welfare and fellow officers' integrity.